Thema A
DNA ancestry tests may look cheap. But your data is the price
by Adam Rutherford
Do customers realise that genetic genealogy companies like 23andMe profit by amassing huge biological datasets?
1
In 1884, at the International Health Exhibition in South Kensington, four million punters came
2
to view the latest scientific marvels: drainage systems, flushing toilets and electrically
3
illuminated fountains. There, the scientist Francis Galton set up the Anthropometric
4
Laboratory, where common folk would pay 3d (around 80p today) to enter, and anonymously
5
fill out a data card. Galton’s technicians recorded 11 metrics, including height, hair colour,
6
keenness of sight, punch strength and colour perception, and the ability to hear high-pitched
7
noises, tested via whistles made by Messrs Tisley & Co, Brompton Road. Over the course
8
of a week, 9,337 people went home with some trivial information about themselves, and
9
Galton amassed the largest dataset of human characteristics ever compiled up to that time –
10
and a stack of cash.
11
There is nothing new under the sun. In the past decade, millions of punters have parted
12
with their cash and a vial of saliva, and in exchange they received some information about
13
their DNA. Our genomes are a treasure trove of biological data, and an industry has sprung
14
up to sell products based on our newfound ability to quickly and cheaply read and interpret
15
DNA.
16
The biggest of these companies is 23andMe: five million paying customers since 2006,
17
usually nosing for clues about their ancestry. Unlike most genetic genealogy companies,
18
23andMe also offers health-related information, on traits such as eye colour, predisposition
19
to a handful of diseases, and the tendency to puke when drinking alcohol.
20
As with Galton’s scheme, 23andMe was never interested in your personal history or your
21
eyes. What it wants is to own and curate the biggest biological dataset in the world. So it was
22
no surprise when the company announced a $300m (£233m) deal with pharmaceutical
23
mammoth GlaxoSmithKline last month to develop drugs based on the data you paid to give
24
them. This is not illegal in any way. 23andMe told users that it was planning to do this, and in
25
2015 had done something similar, but on a smaller scale, concerning Parkinson’s disease.
26
The new deal is the biggest commercial venture of its sort so far.
27
This is all unknown territory, and warrants serious thought by regulators as well as by
28
customers. 23andMe is unambiguous about its plans: board member Patrick Chung told Fast
29
Company in 2013: “Once you have the data, [the company] does actually become the
30
Google of personalised healthcare.” Genomes can be mined for subtleties that only become
31
visible with such voluminous data. I’ve little doubt that interesting science will emerge from
32
this, and new drugs may well be developed to treat awful diseases. I also have no doubt that
33
these drugs will be sold back to you.
34
By buying into 23andMe you are not a consumer or user, you are in fact the product.
35
Again, 23andMe was explicit about this, and gave all its customers the option of not giving up
36
their genomic data to commercial ventures beyond their control. But of the five million people
37
on its database, more than four million did not opt out, and their data is now fair game. By
38
tinkering with some fun ancestry trinkets, you relinquish control over information that is
39
unique to you, and allow it to become a commodity to be traded.
40
The concerns this raises are similar to many of those created by our new online lives:
41
privacy, data breaches, security, anonymisation. It hasn’t happened yet, but can genome
42
data held by private companies be stolen, or de-anonymised? Concerns about the potential
43
discriminatory use of personal genomics by insurance companies are well founded. There’s
44
no clear pattern of how insurers will or can use information from genetic tests in assessing
45
life cover, but at least in the US, they are entitled to demand medical records, including
46
details of inherited predispositions to particular diseases.
47
Can information in these databases be subpoenaed? Earlier this year, an open-access
48
genealogy database was used to solve a series of decades-old crimes. The prolific American
49
murderer and rapist known as the Golden State Killer was identified after a genetic profile
50
from a 1980 crime scene was uploaded to a website called GEDmatch. Amateur sleuths
51
constructed a family tree that within a few days identified 72-year-old former police officer
52
Joseph James DeAngelo, whose identity was confirmed by secret collection of DNA samples
53
from his rubbish and the door handle of his car. The outcome may represent justice long
54
overdue, but the methods represent an ethical minefield.
55
In short: if you really want to spend your cash to discover that you are descended from
56
Vikings (spoiler: if you have European ancestry, you are) or you have blue eyes (try a mirror),
57
go ahead. But be aware of what you are really giving up, and consider the potential risks if
58
things go wrong.
59
Twenty-five years ago, the fictional potential of DNA was revealed to the world in
60
Jurassic Park. Resurrected dinosaurs are never going to happen – DNA is robust, but only
61
over hundreds, thousands, or hundreds of thousands of years at the very most, not the 66m
62
required for a sample of dinosaur genome. In reality, the wonders of modern genetics
63
continue to transform science and society in unpredictable ways. But the moral core of those
64
films – Dr Ian Malcolm, played by Jeff Goldblum – can still teach us something. He is cynical
65
and refuses to be bewitched by the spectacle.
66
“Don’t you see the danger inherent in what you’re doing here,” he warns. “Genetic power
67
is the most awesome force the planet’s ever seen, but you wield it like a kid that’s found his
68
dad’s gun.”
(923 words)
Rutherford, A. (2018). DNA ancestry tests may look cheap. But your data is the price. The Guardian, August 10, 2018.
Assignments
1.
Outline Rutherford’s observations on private DNA tests and the concerns he expresses.
2.
Analyse how the author raises the readers’ awareness of the implications of DNA testing.
3.
Choose one of the following tasks:
3.1
“In reality, the wonders of modern genetics continue to transform science and society in unpredictable ways.” (ll. 62–63)
The author of the article, Adam Rutherford, runs the blog Science Matters and asks his readers to contribute. Referring to the statement above, write a blog entry, discussing opportunities and challenges in the field of genetic engineering.
The author of the article, Adam Rutherford, runs the blog Science Matters and asks his readers to contribute. Referring to the statement above, write a blog entry, discussing opportunities and challenges in the field of genetic engineering.
or
3.2
Using the message of the cartoon as a starting point, assess to what extent people’s private lives will be affected by technological developments in the future.
Chris Slane: DNA Test
(available at: https://www.slanecartoon.com/media/b3be49d8-1ea4-4a90-92fd-4cf12a3d903c- dna-test; accessed: 7 May 2024)