Aufgabe II
Aufgabenstellung
Outline the societal expectations men are faced with according to Cantor.
Examine how the author conveys his attitude regarding patriarchy. Focus on communicative strategies and use of language.
Choose one of the following tasks:
“Patriarchy is toxic to everyone.” (l. 49)
Discuss the quote, referring to the text at hand and materials studied in class, such as the short stories by Kate Chopin, Fay Weldon, and Bernardine Evaristo.
or
You are taking part in the monthly writing contest of the European Solidarity Corps, an EU initiative for young people. You have been given the post by @unwomen to use as a starting point for an essay in which you justify why it is still necessary to include the topic of gender equality in school curricula.
Write the essay.

Quelle: @unwomen. “The fight for #GenderEquality is under threat. […]” Instagram, 1. Juli 2025.
Material
Text: Matthew Cantor, “Dude, the Patriarchy Messed Up My Life – and Yours Too” (2021)
¹ Hanson – a US American pop rock band popular in the 1990s
² Fantastic Flowers paper-cutting set – a crafting toy from the 1990s to create paper flower bouquets
(791 words)
Quelle: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2021/sep/24/boys-patriarchy-toxic-masculinity. Zugriff am 24.04.2025.
Weiter lernen mit SchulLV Plus!
monatlich kündbarSchulLV Plus-Vorteile im ÜberblickDu hast bereits einen Account?inhaltliche Aspekte:
societal expectations for men according to Cantor
-
having a general liking for roughness
-
disliking anything considered typical of girls
-
not lowering yourself to a female’s status in society
-
suppressing emotions or expressing them with brutality
-
using a stereotypically masculine way of speaking
-
keeping relationships superficial
-
retaining a strong and confident appearance
mögliche inhaltliche Aspekte:
The author regards patriarchy as a destructive social construct, which he makes clear through
communicative strategies, such as
-
drastic, blunt title (“Patriarchy Messed Up My Life”): showcasing the author’s emotional involvement, evoking the reader’s empathy
-
explanation of the concept of patriarchy (“a classmate informed me,” l. 1; “codes of conduct” Cantor was “supposed to abide by,” ll. 5f.; “a teacher made me see things in a new light,” l. 13; “no boy is born asking to be part of this system,” ll. 22f.): illustrating how it is something that was forced upon him by others
-
mention of personal experiences (e.g. being assaulted for no reason after a party, cf. ll. 24-31; feeling the need to “shift into Dude Mode,” ll. 38f., in order to fit in): demonstrating the author’s struggles with the system
-
use of external sources (e.g. citing Robert Webb, cf. ll. 49-51): supporting his line of argumentation concerning the purpose of masculinity
use of language, such as
-
contrasts (e.g. “tomboy” vs. “sissy,” ll. 2f.; “Superheroes, laser tag,” l. 7, vs. “Hanson or playing with […] Fantastic Flowers paper-cutting set,” ll. 9f.; “badge of pride” vs. “source of shame,” ll. 11f.): underlining the differences between assigned gender roles
-
enumerations (e.g. “Superheroes, laser tag, books about sword-wielding mice,” l. 7; “the repression of feelings, the difficulty in finding connections, the glorification of violence,” ll. 20f.): highlighting the numerous traditional expectations boys face growing up
-
juxtapositions (e.g. “Patriarchy is toxic to everyone. By the same token, feminism helps us all,” l. 49): clarifying his point of view
-
capitalisation (e.g. “ABORT – FEELINGS DETECTED”, ll. 56f.): underscoring the urgency of his message
-
metaphors (e.g. “society’s ladder,” l. 15; “man-alarm,” l. 56): illustrating gender inequality
-
similes (e.g. “I felt like an alien,” l. 44): enhancing the author’s confusion regarding male behaviour
-
use of quotation marks (“‘sissy,’” l. 3; “traditionally ‘feminine,’” l. 15): emphasizing the author distancing himself from the underlying concepts of these words and questioning their usage
-
parentheses (“– a culture built on male supremacy that prizes masculinity above all else –,” ll. 16f.; “[…], as a straight white cisgender man,” l. 32): stressing the author’s reluctance to identify with the ascribed gender roles and concepts
mögliche inhaltliche Aspekte:
explanation of quote: patriarchy is harmful for every individual in society
aspects supporting the quote
-
patriarchy is built on fixed gender roles and assignments and therefore does not leave much room for creativity and individualism (e.g. Cantor being shoehorned into certain expectations in text at hand; Martha being restrained in her life choices in “Weekend”)
-
patriarchy prevents connecting on an emotional level (e.g. Cantor forced to only experience superficial friendships; marriage turning into frustration in “Weekend”)
-
oppression of females through patriarchy (e.g. reference to position on society’s ladder in text at hand; Louise only feeling freedom after her husband’s death in “The Story of an Hour”)
-
non-conformity to patriarchal structures often treated with exclusion (e.g. slurs in text at hand)
-
exhausting and often unacknowledged workload of women at home (e.g. household, care work, etc.) keeping women in their place and leaving no room for improvement (e.g. Martha having no time for herself or taking action to change her situation)
-
patriarchy causes inequality and is destructive to democracy (e.g. in history: no representation for women in politics; exclusion from equal education opportunities)
-
patriarchy makes individuals experience social pressure
aspects opposing the quote
-
men often profit from a system largely built on inequality (e.g. reference to society’s ladder in text at hand; careers of the husbands in the short stories)
-
women profit from their husband’s status as well, therefore supporting the system (e.g. Katie in “Weekend”)
-
political systems in most countries today mirror patriarchal structures (e.g. very few women in political positions of power), thereby modelling what is perceived as the norm (e.g. Cantor experiencing patriarchy in every stage of his life; Martha not revolting against the system)
-
patriarchy is an established system that creates familiarity and illusion of stability (e.g. tea time lady culture in “The First Feminists”)
-
patriarchy is being socially and culturally revived at the moment (e.g. tradwife trend on social media)
-
navigating patriarchal structures as an individual agency (i.e. challenging patriarchy is possible without being oppressed)
mögliche inhaltliche Aspekte:
explanation of the post: according to the UN, of nations worldwide report adverse reactions regarding women’s rights
possible aspects
-
reasons why the topic is still relevant
-
studies show that the goal of gender equality has not yet been achieved (e.g. post at hand)
-
democracy and free will are under threat if people involved do not possess the same rights (e.g. social development in the Middle East)
-
current social and political developments show a resurgence of patriarchy (e.g. tradwife trend)
-
-
reasons why school curricula should educate about the topic
-
scope (e.g. mandatory schooling ensuring education for everyone)
-
raising awareness of the issue (e.g. with school projects, political talks and discussions)
-
educational mandate of schools (e.g. offering unbiased, multifaceted and age-appropriate introduction to the topic)
-
teaching skills and tools for forming well-founded opinions and appropriate actions (e.g. media literacy; education for sustainable development)
-
fewer opportunities to educate yourself once you are an adult (e.g. increased level of responsibilities in everyday life)
-